Kristof: U.S. played part in crimes Netanyahu is charged with

A refusal to push harder to end indiscriminate bombings in Gaza and allow more relief should concern us.

By Nicholas Kristof / The New York Times

The arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court on Thursday for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel will reverberate through that country, but it also raises questions for the United States.

If the international court believes that Israel may have committed war crimes in the Gaza Strip and engaged in a policy of deliberate starvation of civilians, then whose weapons were used? Which country protected Israel in the United Nations and blocked more robust efforts to channel food to starving Palestinians? The answer, of course, is the United States.

President Joe Biden in May denounced the ICC prosecutor’s request for warrants and said that “there is no equivalence — none — between Israel and Hamas.” But there is a moral equivalence between an American child and an Israeli child and a Palestinian child. They all deserve to be protected. We should not operate as if there is a hierarchy in the value of children’s lives, with some invaluable and others expendable.

Aid workers I’ve interviewed overwhelmingly agree that Israel has used starvation as a tool of war. The impulse of Americans who are skeptical of the warrants will be to respond by noting the brutality of the Oct. 7 atrocities by Hamas that preceded Israel’s assault on Gaza. Fair enough: The ICC also issued an arrest warrant for a Hamas leader for crimes against humanity.

The point is that war crimes by one side do not justify additional war crimes by the other. We should unite in condemning the savagery of attacks by Hamas, but that savagery does not excuse Israel’s use of U.S. weapons to level entire neighborhoods in Gaza.

Biden has spoken a good deal about the challenge Russia creates for the “rules-based international order,” and it’s because of Russian brutality in Ukraine that an arrest warrant was issued for Russian President Vladimir Putin. But if we decry Putin’s violations of international law in Ukraine, how can we simultaneously supply weapons that an international tribunal suggests are used for breaches of humanitarian law in Gaza?

Israel is now more isolated than ever, and it will be more difficult for Netanyahu to travel. Americans should also reflect on how we have become more isolated, as reflected in the U.N. resolution this week calling for an immediate cease-fire in Gaza. Our allies supported it, but the United States vetoed it.

When our weapons are implicated in war crimes, maybe it’s past time for a policy rethink.

This article originally appeared in The New York Times, c.2024.

Talk to us

> Give us your news tips.

> Send us a letter to the editor.

> More Herald contact information.

More in Opinion

toon
Editorial cartoons for Tuesday, Dec. 10

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

A burned out truck in Malden, Wash., Wednesday, Sept. 9, 2020, two days after a fast moving wildfire swept through the area. Nearly all of the homes and municipal buildings - including the post office and fire department - in the small town of Malden were burned to the ground. (Rajah Bose/The New York Times)
Trump: State officials planning for ‘chaos’ of second Trump term

Along with potential court challenges, the state treasurer wants to make sure federal funding isn’t held up.

Comment: Politicians and public need crash course in economics

A better understanding of inflation, global trade and families’ needs could make all the difference.

Friedman: Five quick takes on the regime change in Syria

All thoughts that the U.S. should not be involved ignore the opportunity and peril of the situation.

Stephens: Syrians also have Israel to thank for liberation

Israel’s pursuit of Iran-backed terrorists helped to weaken and isolate al-Assad from his supporters.

Comment: Lame-duck Congress can still save medication abortion

Republicans have vowed to use the Comstock Act against the pills. Congress should repeal the archaic law.

Electric Time technician Dan LaMoore adjusts a clock hand on a 1000-lb., 12-foot diameter clock constructed for a resort in Vietnam, Tuesday, March 9, 2021, in Medfield, Mass. Daylight saving time begins at 2 a.m. local time Sunday, March 14, 2021, when clocks are set ahead one hour. (AP Photo/Elise Amendola)
Editorial: Stop the clock on our twice-yearly time change

State lawmakers may debate a bill to adopt standard time permanently, ending the daylight time switch.

The Everett Public Library in Everett, Washington on Thursday, Jan. 19, 2023. (Annie Barker / The Herald)
Editorial: What do you want and what are you willing to pay?

As local governments struggle to fund services with available revenue, residents have decisions ahead.

toon
Editorial cartoons for Monday, Dec. 9

A sketchy look at the news of the day.… Continue reading

Green investments aren’t having a good year, but their focus on the bottom line still makes good financial sense.

By Mark Gongloff / Bloomberg Opinion As a concept, environmentally responsible investing… Continue reading

Comment: If you want to be a grandparent, make parenting easier

The birth rate is dropping because it’s difficult to see support for young families.

Collins: A second-rate crime warrants second-rate pardon

Biden’s pardon of his son was ill-advised, but Trump has already had some doozies of his own.

Support local journalism

If you value local news, make a gift now to support the trusted journalism you get in The Daily Herald. Donations processed in this system are not tax deductible.